Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's because it's about oil not fuel.......LOL!
Might want to consult a dealer, just to see if they have any better data on what might be coming for the average Joe. Theoretically, if you ran 0W40 on your own accord and your motor grenades, they could deny warranty. Not sure that is very likely, but it is plausible!Hmmm. I was going to change my oil on Saturday. Oil is sitting in the garage. This says only vehicles on dealer lots. So, are they going to say 0W40 for all the 6.2Ls?
I am curious about the same thing. Was gonna change my oil next weekend. But I haven't bought new oil and filter yet.Hmmm. I was going to change my oil on Saturday. Oil is sitting in the garage. This says only vehicles on dealer lots. So, are they going to say 0W40 for all the 6.2Ls?
The thinner oil also helps with cooling thermal hot spots due to the closer tolerance in the more modern engines. Some engines such as the new Ford 7.3 gasser even have small orifices to spray oil even on the backside of the pistons. This engine issue is a huge problem for GM and now that Uncle is involved is even more so. I have been associated with the involvement of Uncle in aircraft accident investigations. To just make a statement "they don’t have the data to narrow this down to specific VINs" is not fair as it is possible that a different supplier was used that employed different process and even materials (metallurgical differences, machining speeds and lubricants used during manufacturing even the heat treatment process) to meet the specification for the failed components in question.Yeah @AXE I totally agree. Oil alone isn’t going to magically fix all these problems. While it might help this is just GM avoiding engine replacements on nearly a million vehicles because they don’t have the data to narrow this down to specific VINs. Engine design flaws would affect everyone. Can the NHTSA call bullshit on the corrective action or is any action allowed until enough additional failures occur? I don’t know but an oil change and a plastic filler cap is a testament to what GM thinks about us.
Yep, $15/qt at that price I definitely won’t be doing 3,333 mile changes. Hell, might as well go to 7,500 per GM recommendation and let them replace what fails and dump this truck before warranty expires. Seems like the best strategy.Yeah I just got this on my chevy also. Is the below website accurate? Looking at anything other than Mobil 1 Supercar, none of the rest mention Dexos on the bottle. If Supercar has to be used, oil changes are about to go from $60 to $120.
I just want GM to restore my confidence in the brand. Most owners are well educated and can understand a detailed explanation but GM never seems to want to share that. I’m not sure the NHTSA will force their hand. It just doesn’t seem like GM cares about my future business. It’s my belief that GM hopes that the oil change will reduce the catastrophic failures but inside their closed door meetings I’m sure that the statisticians are predicting a continued smaller percentage of catastrophic failures due to design flaws, manufacturing issues, assembly mistakes, etc. This is not the aviation industry so there is a lot less accountability.The thinner oil also helps with cooling thermal hot spots due to the closer tolerance in the more modern engines. Some engines such as the new Ford 7.3 gasser even have small orifices to spray oil even on the backside of the pistons. This engine issue is a huge problem for GM and now that Uncle is involved is even more so. I have been associated with the involvement of Uncle in aircraft accident investigations. To just make a statement "they don’t have the data to narrow this down to specific VINs" is not fair as it is possible that a different supplier was used that employed different process and even materials (metallurgical differences, machining speeds and lubricants used during manufacturing even the heat treatment process) to meet the specification for the failed components in question.
This gets incredibility complicated and often time can absolutely be attributed to a simple human error. The root cause of an error we encountered on the F22 NLG was just unbelievably simple (no crash involved). Supplier did not update a machining operation job process instruction as they are required to do. Short story was the operator of this CNC controlled equipment for over 15 years retired. His replacement had no idea that the op cards were not updated and used the instructions as written. The old operator knew this and used the correct cutting speed, cutter and lubricant. Result the higher machining speed on this specific material and the lubricant not being of the adequate type as well induced excessive heat caused a high level of embrittlement resulting in the early failure of the part in question. The highest level of CAR was issued, and the Supplier was required to support a joint USG as well as Lockheed Martin complete quality system audit and recertification which is in itself $$$$$'s!
Point is everything is not as it seems until all of the information is available. In this case we may most likely find out the detail due to the fact Uncle is involved.
It wasn't supposed to make sense. That's why they issued it. Smoke screens are an effective way to misdirect the opposition and delay the remedy. That's why the lawyers pull big checks, run the clock out for years, and then shake hands and go have drinks afterwards. Meanwhile it's 5 years later and you've moved on so they were successful! Oh, and they make sure the settlement decree claims GM is absolved of any wrongdoing, cause they paid the fees on time.Apparently, the recall listed here ends in 0001 and mine ends in 0000. Mine says no remedy but at the bottom says change the oil. Dealership says nothing to do because they cant order parts against something that says no remedy. Makes no sense to me lol.